@ARTICLE {10.3389 / fsufs.2023.1066465作者= {Graddy-Lovelace,加勒特和Krikorian,杰奎琳和朱厄特,安德里亚和Vivekanandan Avinash斯塔尔,凯瑟琳和辛格因陀罗Shekhar和威尔逊,布拉德和那依勒,帕蒂·内勒,乔治和Pennick,爱德华。杰里},TITLE ={平价作为激进的实用主义:定心农场正义和农业专业知识在农业政策},杂志={可持续食品系统前沿},体积= {7}= {2023},URL = {//www.thespel.com/articles/10.3389/fsufs.2023.1066465}, DOI = {10.3389 / fsufs.2023.1066465}, ISSN = {2571 - 581 x},文摘={治疗的症状,而不是破坏性的农雷竞技rebat业系统,农业政策,研究和宣传需要解决障碍的根源和长期学习的干预措施来对抗它。具体地说,本文侧重于农业平价政策——以农民为主导,政府制定项目安全的一个价格底线和管理供应,防止企业agro-capitalism自由的经济和生态破坏。虽然这些项目仍然主导政策的雷达,奖学金,和公民社会行动,但在过去的几年里,大量的人类有动员在印度呼吁农产品系统转换通过肉猪出栏价格和市场的保护。本文问什么是真正的农场正义和如何进行更新和扩展作为一个大道因从根本上重塑农业,因此粮食系统。平价指定价比例,确保民生,但也更广泛的农场正义运动建立在公平原则的肉猪出栏价格和供应管理合作协调。程序和原则现在大多被认为是“激进”,被认为是低效的,无关紧要的,过时的,和严重的政府overeach-but优势,我们认为,系统的利润来自大宗商品作物生产过剩和agroindustry整合。然而,通过检查奇偶校验通过producer-centric镜头认识到农民的能力、愿望和需要照顾的土地,价格保护和供给协调的思想成为基础,以便农民可以有尊严的生活引领土地和水而生产营养食品。”这个悖论,一个农业治理原则可以看起来激进和常识,牵强附会,pragmatic-deserves关注和分析。作为全球北部农民总数下降情况下,他们的声音从这些对话,减少为世界观完全支持de-agrarianization留出了空间。在南半球情况下保持健壮的农业人口,这些政策对故意de-agrarianization别雷的侵略对农村和农民的生活方式和土地使用权。 Alongside the history of parity programs, principles, and movements in U.S., the paper will examine a vast version of a parity program in India – the Minimum Support Price (MSP) system, which Indian farmers defended and now struggle to expand into a legal right. From East India to the plains of the United States and beyond, parity principles and programs have the potential to offer a pragmatic direction for countering global agro-industrial corporate capture, along with its de-agrarianization, and environmental destruction. The paper explores what and why of parity programs and movements, even as it addresses the complexity of how international parity agreements would unfold. It ends with the need for global supply coordination grounded in food sovereignty and solidarity, and thus the methodological urgency of centering farm justice and agrarian expertise.} }